This final theme of the course centred on identifying and
applying specific reference materials – indexes, bibliographies, biographies,
encyclopledias, dictionaries and maps. These continue to be valuable resources,
however their uses and formats are rapidly evolving through the use of technology and both students and teachers
require increasing support in how to effectively navigate them and apply their
information. With the increased focus on effective integration of technologies, classrooms
are moving away from more traditional formats (books and paper) and exploring
online and digital reference sources.
As teacher librarians we
must provide excellent reference services in the area of technological literacy and master the three key
qualities, described by Riedling (2005): 1) knowledge of electronic resources,
2) excellent communication skills to train
teachers and students in effective use of these resources and 3) competence in
selecting and assessing the highest quality resources to meet the needs of learners
(p.4). Foundational in this is not simply that teacher librarians train learners
in information literacy, rather that teacher libraries are masters themselves of
the process (Mueller, 2016).
When untrained students (and
teachers!) pursue information through digital reference materials, they too
often fall prey to the chronic use of questionable references of inferior
quality. Sites such as urbandictionary.com and Wikipedia become quick-access ready
references, while more dependable and vetted resources, such as ERAC databases
go underused.
As Lending Libraries evolve into
Resource Centres and now into School Library Learning Commons, teacher
librarians must boldly approach integrating and using digital resources with confidence
and skill.
For me, formative learning in this
area occurred as we studied grey literature and the Deep Web. Realizing that
much (indeed, most) of the internet’s valuable resources are ‘hidden’ beneath
passwords or in databases revealed that I have only been training my students about
the tip of the internet iceberg. Class discussions about ERAC databases
provided opportunity for me to reflect on how rarely I access those resources
myself. In order to become the leader that is needed for a vibrant SLLC, I must
not only become fluent in database access and use but also initiate leadership in
training my professional peers and our students in their effective use as well.
I now consider a more integrated
approach wherein surface sources, such as Wikipedia are combined with other
resources such as online encyclopedias or almanacs to provide a more complete
research process. Using Harris’ (2007) rules as a guideline, I will increase my
focus on teaching students to start with generalized resources (such as Wikipedia)
and encourage them to dig deeper and seek out multiple resources that verify their
generalized findings and to use these high-quality resources as their primary reference
materials.
My theme 3 project focused on finding
practical ways of integrating trusted digital resources, such as online vetted
databases, and training students and teachers both in evaluating and applying the
information they find in them. Creating digital pathways and training students
in guided inquiry are both helpful in fostering increased information seeking
and reference evaluation skills.
A surprising consideration throughout
this theme was the ongoing question of the continued validity of traditional text
formats. In our class discussions, we wondered how physical encyclopedias compare with the ever-evolving Wikipedia and whether students still need paper
copies of the dictionary in their classes. The answers to these are varied and
complex. However, the fundamental understanding in this discussion is that no
single resource can fully satisfy the needs of every student - which is the
core of Resource-Based Learning. Just as googlemaps can never really give the reader
a hands-on sense of the big picture provided by a traditional paper map, so too can
online dictionaries or quick google searches never provide the full spectrum of
information at once. It is because of this that the SLLC will never be without
books. Quality teacher librarians will always guide students to the best collection
of resources to meet student learning needs – both physical and digital.
References
Harris, C. (2007). Can we make peace with Wikipedia? School Library Journal, 53(6), 26.
Mueller, A. (2016). Lesson 8: Digital Resources, the Web, and Grey Literature [Lecture Notes]. Retrieved from https://canvas.ubc.ca/courses/20490/pages/lesson-8-digital-resources-the-web-and-grey-literature?module_item_id=617533
Riedling, Ann. Reference skills for the school library media specialist: Tools and tips, (Second Edition). Linworth. 2005.
images courtesy of pixabay.com
Mueller, A. (2016). Lesson 8: Digital Resources, the Web, and Grey Literature [Lecture Notes]. Retrieved from https://canvas.ubc.ca/courses/20490/pages/lesson-8-digital-resources-the-web-and-grey-literature?module_item_id=617533
Riedling, Ann. Reference skills for the school library media specialist: Tools and tips, (Second Edition). Linworth. 2005.
images courtesy of pixabay.com


I like your point that no single resource will satisfy the needs of every student. Each one branches off to other ideas to dig deeper. You raise a good point about resources like ERAC, too, that as a TL part of the role is to be a leader of both students and colleagues. We must refer to and use such resources to lead by example of best practices.
ReplyDeleteI've enjoyed reading your posts throughout this course -- take care & all the best!
Good reflection on the main topics of theme 3. Your highlights, discussions, key takeaways and plans for implementation later in your career are all great goals. You have come away with much new learning and have demonstrated your commitment to sharing this new learning with your students going forward. Good specific ideas regarding wikipedia and layers of information searching and retrieval.
ReplyDeleteYour summary and observations struck me as strong support for the continued relevance of well-educated teacher librarians working in every school. It is our job to nudge our colleagues forward to become educated in the effective use of both print and technology-based resources, and further to collaborate with them to ensure that our students are being taught reference based learning skills in conjunction with 21st-century learning skills. Further, as you said, teacher librarians “guide students to the best collection of resources to meet student learning needs – both physical and digital”, without this, our students will become frustrated or fall back to only using resources such as Wikipedia to answer their queries. You made excellent points to support the importance of what we do as teacher librarians. Thank you, Sarah!
ReplyDelete